The Relevance of Progressive Law in Legal Reasoning in Indonesia

Authors

  • Vincentius Patria Setyawan Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta Author

Keywords:

Progressive Law, Substantive Law, Legal Reasoning

Abstract

Legal reasoning in Indonesia often faces challenges in achieving substantive justice due to rigid and textual interpretations of the law. Progressive law, introduced by Satjipto Rahardjo, offers a more dynamic and humanistic legal approach, emphasizing law as a tool for social change rather than merely a set of normative rules. This perspective is particularly relevant in addressing contemporary legal issues in Indonesia, where formalistic legal interpretations sometimes fail to deliver justice. This study aims to analyze the relevance of progressive law in shaping legal reasoning in Indonesia. It seeks to explore how the principles of progressive law can contribute to a more responsive and justice-oriented legal system. This study employs a normative legal research method with a conceptual approach. It examines primary and secondary legal sources, including legal doctrines, jurisprudence, and relevant literature, to understand the theoretical and practical implications of progressive law in Indonesian legal reasoning. The study finds that progressive law provides a necessary paradigm shift in Indonesian legal reasoning by encouraging judges and legal practitioners to go beyond rigid legal texts and consider social realities. It highlights that legal reasoning based on progressive law can bridge the gap between law in books and law in action, fostering legal decisions that better reflect societal needs and justice. However, challenges remain in its application, particularly in balancing legal certainty and judicial discretion. The incorporation of progressive law principles in legal reasoning can enhance the Indonesian legal system’s responsiveness to societal dynamics. Further research and judicial training are needed to optimize its implementation for a more just legal order.

References

Ansori, L. (2018). Reformasi Penegakan Hukum Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Jurnal Yuridis, 4(2), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.35586/.v4i2.244

Christianto, H. (2012). Penafsiran Hukum Progresif Dalam Perkara Pidana. Mimbar Hukum, 23(3), 479–500. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16170

Farida, A. (2023). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pergeseran Nilai-Nilai Otentik Keindonesiaan Ke Hukum Positivistik Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. JPeHI (Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia), 4(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.61689/jpehi.v4i2.504

Gani, A. W. (2016). Hermeneutika Sebagai Metode Penemuan Hukum Yang Progresif. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v2i1.7276

Hakim, M. R. (2016). Implementasi Rechtsvinding Yang Berkarakteristik Hukum Progresif. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.5.2.2016.227-248

Herlambang, P. H. (2019). Positivisme Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Ilmu Dan Penegakan Hukum. Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev), 2(1), 336–342. https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v2i1.36187

Hermanto, A. B. (2016). Ajaran Positivisme Hukum Di Indonesia: Kritik Dan Alternatif Solusinya. Jurnal Hukum Dan Bisnis (Selisik), 2(2), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.35814/selisik.v2i2.650

Islamiyati, I. (2018). Kritik Filsafat Hukum Positivisme Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Hukum Yang Berkeadilan. Law, Development and Justice Review, 1(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.v1i1.3574

Maruf, S. A., & Harefa, S. (2023). Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Wijaya Putra Law Review, 2(2), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.38156/wplr.v2i2.140

Putuhena, M. I. F. (2013). Politik Hukum Perundang-Undangan: Mempertegas Reformasi Legislasi Yang Progresif. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 2(3), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v2i3.66

Rahmatullah, I. (2022). Filsafat Positivisme Hukum (Legal Positivisme). Adalah, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v6i1.26427

Rismawati, S. D. (2015). Menebarkan Keadilan Sosial Dengan Hukum Progresif Di Era Komodifikasi Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v13i1.485

Sarmadi, A. S. (2012). Membebaskan Positivisme Hukum Ke Ranah Hukum Progresif (Studi Pembacaan Teks Hukum Bagi Penegak Hukum). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(2), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.2.58

Septiningsih, I. (2024). The Relevance of Progressive Law to Legal Reasoning in Indonesia. LAW&PASS: International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies, 1(2), 162–167.

Setiaji, M. L., & Ibrahim, A. (2018). Kajian Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Negara The Rule Of Law: Antara Hukum Progresif Dan Hukum Positif. Lex Scientia Law Review, 2(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v2i2.27580

Suhardin, S. (2020). Penegakan Hukum Konflik Sosial Perspektif Hukum Progresif. JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v2i1.1108

Taufiqurrahman, F., Ibnususilo, E., & Melina, M. (2023). Pergesaran Penegakan Hukum Yang Positivistik Menuju Ke Penegakan Hukum Yang Progresif. Journal Equitable, 8(1), 159–183. https://doi.org/10.37859/jeq.v8i1.4450

Triwahyuningsih, T. (2017). Penegakan Hukum Progresif Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Substantif Berdasarkan Nilai-Nilai Pancasila. Hukum Transendental, 1(1), 241–251.

Wiguna, M. O. C. (2021). Pemikiran Hukum Progresif untuk Perlindungan Hukum dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Hukum Adat. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(1), 112–137. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1816

Yustia, D. A., Abdulgani, R. K., & Mulyani, L. W. (2024). Progressive Legal Perspective in Providing Legal Protection for Educators.: English. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(6), 2374–2383. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i6.646

Downloads

Published

2025-06-15

Issue

Section

Articles